Group
B:
Optimization of Knowledge Networks to Strengthen EMS activities |
Carl
Bartone, Chantall Fortin, Álvaro González, Enrico Gotti, Domenico
Iarossi,
Claudio Langone, Franco Micieli de Biase, Giuseppe Magnaghi,
Juan Manuel Salazar, Ricardo Sánchez, Walter Ubal |
Initial basis
for the network
|
The
knowledge network to be developed from the present structure of EMS
must coordinate its actions with horizontal cooperation networks and
municipality associations. To this end, we propose to move on with
the present working agreement with the MercoCities Network, as well
as to extend activities in the Central American region in
coordination with the FEMICA network. In addition, the network will
have –in the short term-- to define a working strategy with
associations of municipalities in Andean and Caribbean Countries, as
well as with city networks in Europe and Canada. |
1. |
Conceptual
bases in the promotion of the EMS knowledge network:
|
|
Users
and participants: primary
users are local governments in small and medium-size cities; it must
be pointed out that EMS knowledge network eventual participation in
the global market may imply the integration of larger cities.
Benefit:
it allows for local
government capacity-building in order to develop sustainable
environmental policies via a working modality that is cost-effective
and implies development, dissemination, training-activity uses, and
public communication of knowledge.
Main
management values: |
|
i. |
it
must provide the broadest and easiest understanding and
participation of all citizens and to this end it must be provided
with instruments; |
|
ii. |
it
must protect the identity of the different cultural groups in each
community; |
|
iii. |
it
must provide institutional and professional training of local
governments and the environmental education and communication of all
social actors; |
|
iv. |
it
must tend to facilitate articulation of local governments with
regional, national and supra-national governments; |
|
v. |
it
must be open to new actors that express their interest in its
further development and seek governmental decentralisation; |
|
vi. |
it
must play a proactive role in the integration of governments of
small cities that are not themselves capable of absorbing and
disseminating knowledge in their fields of intervention; |
|
vii. |
it
must promote connectivity and cooperation with other networks and
issues related to governance questions; prevention of climatic
environmental risk; health; environmental deterioration due to water
pollution; desertification and global change; |
|
viii. |
it
must provide itself and use assorted instruments that allow for a
broad dissemination of knowledge in environmental education and
communication at the level of schools, religious groups,
professional associations, consumer leagues, etc.; |
|
ix. |
it
must foster participatory initiatives that facilitate joining
efforts that result in benefits for all citizens; |
|
x. |
it
must give priority and foster the production and access to knowledge
necessary for local action in relation to the wider scope of global
issues; |
|
xi. |
it
must give priority to initiatives that facilitate economic
efficiency at the level of municipal action; tapping and enhanced
usage of resources involved in municipal management. |
|
Management:
EMS staff will be responsible
for drawing a strategy and activity plan to ensure financial
self-sustainability of the network, incorporating the contribution
of its users, members, donors, foundations, etc. |
2. |
Integration
of the EMS knowledge network |
|
The
network to be created will have the local governments as the core of
action; as part of its activity in the promotion of exchanges and
communication, it will relate to: |
|
i. |
Active
university networks, research centres, professional associations,
specialised data banks, etc., that generate specialised knowledge to
be used in the management at the level of local government. |
|
ii. |
Training
centres that specialise in municipal management. |
|
iii. |
Active
networks in agencies that specialise in the universality of local
government knowledge so that it may be used at the global level. |
|
iv. |
Organisations
that act as network facilitators and help maintain the actions and
interests of a wide range of stakeholders in a continuous way, thus
facilitating discussions, fora and meetings. |
|
v. |
Service
consortiums, environmental licensing and certification units. |
|
vi. |
Associations
and Federations of Municipalities. |
|
vii. |
Central
and regional government agencies in charge of promoting
decentralisation, "municipalism" and sustainable urban
development management. |
|
viii. |
Private
sector acting in the area of environmental services and production
showing their endorsement to sustainable environmental management
principles. |
|
ix. |
Consumer
defence groups. |
3. |
The EMS
partnership strategy in building the knowledge network |
|
The
EMS must integrate the following stakeholders as partners at
different levels, either sporadically or on a permanent basis: local
governments, private sector, civil society through NGOs and
communities, research centres, training centres, centres for the
universal dissemination of knowledge, funding and development
agencies, professional associations, federations of municipalities,
support foundations, regional and national governments whose
strategic objective is decentralisation. |
4. |
Identification
of specific actions to strengthen the EMS specialised knowledge
network. |
|
The
World Bank expresses its determination to maintain its
cooperation with EMS in the search for opportunities to coordinate
and develop the Network.
The
Inter American Development Bank reasserts its interest to
keep on cooperating with EMS in the development of the Network.
The
European Commission offers (proposes) its linkages with
science and technology regional cooperation programs focused in the
urban environmental and governance problems at municipal level, as
well as to build a coordination strategy with the second phase of
the URB-AL Network, financed and managed by the EC.
The
United Nations Development Program - UNDP expresses interest
in the integration and use of different programmes in Latin America
and the Caribbean, namely: |
|
- |
Training
in the application of cost-benefit analysis. |
|
- |
Connection
and connectivity with other networks, especially with SDNP and
SISNET. |
|
- |
Promote
popularisation of the network’s knowledge through instruments
based on the "Tierramérica" model. |
|
- |
Identification
of funding modalities in local environmental management actions. |
|
The
United Nations Environment Program - UNEP for Latin America
and the Caribbean offers the EMS to start with the development of
the network through its integration in the following activities: |
|
- |
UNEP-UNDP
Programme on changes in consumption trends in the society |
|
- |
Global
Plan to control marine pollution sources, relative to improving
alternatives in sewage management. |
|
- |
Environmental
Technology Centres. Dissemination of experiences in local
environmental management in Latin America and the Caribbean. |
|
- |
Wider
dissemination of the Global Environmental Panorama bulletin
throughout cities in Latin America and the Caribbean. |
|
- |
Participation
in the Regional Environmental Forum of Ministers and its preparatory
meetings. |
|
- |
Development
of the Urban Environmental Training Network |
|
The
Piemonte Region - Italy, proposes that the EMS should either
become a link or establish cooperation mechanisms between the
Merco-Cities Network and the Piedmont Region.
The
Lombardia Region – Italy offers the possibility of
integrating the Network to its Observatory experiences and to share
its experience and knowledge in the field of land management and
water resources.
Both
regions express their will to cooperate with the EMS in the
dissemination of the relationship method between the private and
public stakeholders.
CISPEL
of Italy expresses its will
to explore avenues that promote joint action with the EMS at two
levels: a) institutional, in favour of modernisation processes in
the environmental services provision sector at the municipal level,
and b) through the promotion of proposals for pilot projects that
facilitate links between Italian and Latin American companies. In
this regard, CISPEL invites EMS to join in the organisation of
Regional Workshops to be held throughout the year 2002 in three
countries of Latin America and the Caribbean. Within this framework,
coordination is envisaged through a network that will: |
|
- |
coordinate
a presentation of the Italian experience and any other elements that
may be of interest to Latin America. |
|
- |
identify
pilot project hypotheses that may be implemented through cooperation
agreements in three Latin American countries where workshops are
held. |
|
- |
Involve
local and national governments of the three countries where the 2002
seminars will be held –as well as multilateral organisations—in
the process to define regulations and methods. |
|
The
three workshops will set the bases for the definition of the
following stages of cooperation between CISPEL and EMS. |