|
c.1. |
MANAGING
THE NETWORK |
|
|
The
group analyzes and weighs four types of management: |
|
|
c.1.1. |
Transparent
network -
nothing is done, all entries circulate and there is nobody directly
in charge of the information. |
|
|
c.1.2. |
Management
with control of information flow –
it implies a decision on which information will/will not be allowed
to enter the network. |
|
|
c.1.3. |
Management
with organizational control –
information is channelled through to the constituencies. |
|
|
c.1.4. |
Management
through mobilization of users –
the manager draws the attention of constituencies on the
availability of information in the network. |
|
|
The
EMS knowledge network should be managed following the fourth
modality. |
|
d.1. |
INSTITUTIONALIZATION
OF THE NETWORK |
|
|
This
should be part of the discussion relative to the expected impact
resulting from activities and projects promoted by the network.
Accordingly, in order to maximize the expected impact the following
is proposed: |
|
|
- |
IDRC,
through the Executive Director of the EMS, assumes the
responsibility of organizing an EMS program committee integrated by: |
|
|
|
* |
Group
of donors so that the EMS knowledge network is accountable to the
donors; |
|
|
|
* |
Group
of associates (partners, constituency); |
|
|
|
* |
IDRC
or EMS as network administrator. |
|
|
- |
The
working group will move ahead in a joint meeting where the
donors, the associates and the administration review the ongoing
program and secure its follow-up and feedback. |
|
|
- |
The
donors meet with the administration to review the ongoing
program ("accountability" of the administration). |
|
|
- |
IDRC
will also act as "incubator", towards the
self-sustainability of the network. The Secretariat will work within
IDRC as a trust fund managed by a council of trustees. IDRC ensures
that the Secretariat may receive contributions from bilateral,
multilateral donors or private philanthropes. This is a permanent
development process that will take a minimum of 3 years. |
|
|
- |
IDRC
may become the moral guarantee of the project and the promoter of
donations from other donors to the Secretariat (Trust Fund). |
|
|
- |
IDRC
meets the conditions and institutional support necessary to promote
donations also from the private sector. In this way, it may promote
a change in the traditional lack of confidence between the public
and private sectors in LAC. |
|
e.1. |
IMPLEMENTATION
|
|
|
- |
The
EMS will present a three-year project that will include the
development of the Secretariat as a knowledge network and will
incorporate the criteria recommended by the working group on the
drafting and upgrading of contents. |
|
|
- |
The
funding systems suggested may include donations that are either: |
|
|
|
* |
Bilateral |
|
|
|
* |
Multilateral |
|
|
|
* |
Private
philantropy |
|
|
- |
It
must also include a proposal to securing a significant participation
of local funds. |
|
|
- |
The
EMS must move on with the discussions of the Forum by preparing an
innovative project that combines the efforts of the Forum
participants and the potential actors invo lved in the use of the
network. |
|
|
- |
The
EMS will act as a spin-off promoting the installation of telematic
capacity at the level of municipalities and contributing to the
local government modernization process. |
|
|
- |
The
presence and interest of the participating constituency must be
expressed through their representative bodies, who will endorse the
project presented by the EMS. For example, The Latin American
Chapter of the International Union of Local Authorities, The
Federation of Municipalities of the Central American Isthmus, and
the MercoCities Network. |